Dr Moot

Dr Moot Docs

Get a second AI opinion. Learn how Dr Moot's model panels work, how to run your first deliberation, and how to configure the roster for your team.

A single model's first draft is a guess with good grammar. Dr Moot treats important questions the way people do: it convenes more than one model, has them draft, critique, and revise each other's work, and gives you both the conclusion and the deliberation that produced it — so you can see where the models agreed, where they fought, and how confident the panel really is.

Annotated map of the Lab workspace

Find your way

The ideas behind Dr Moot

Deliberation, not generation

Every run is a structured conversation between models with assigned jobs — drafter, critic, fact-checker, adjudicator. The disagreement between them is the product: it surfaces the weaknesses a single answer would have hidden.

Four shapes of deliberation

  • Relay — one model drafts, another critiques, the first revises, an adjudicator decides. Fast.
  • Debate — two models argue over up to three rounds, then an adjudicator rules.
  • Moot — a four-seat panel: Generator, Sceptic, Specialist, and a Chair who delivers a verdict with a confidence level.
  • Auto — the default. A router model picks the cheapest shape that will answer well, and flags high-stakes questions for verification.

Nothing is a black box

Every intermediate step — drafts, critiques, revisions, web-search evidence, verification, the Chair's verdict — streams live while the run happens and stays attached to the answer afterwards. If the answer matters, read the dissent before you act on the conclusion.

One roster, shared defaults, personal overrides

Admins curate the pool of models and assign a default model to every seat. You can pin your own models per seat in settings; anything you leave on the system default keeps following admin changes automatically.

On this page